← Back to Blog

Levels of Prompt Engineering: Level 3 - Adaptive Prompting

March 17, 2025By Jasdeep
Share:
<- Read the Levels of Prompting Overview

Level 1: Basic Prompting

Level 2: Structured Prompting

Level 3: Adaptive Prompting

Level 4: Conversational Prompting

Level 5: Attention Engineering

Coming Soon!
Level 6:
Cognitive Framework Engineering


Level 3: Adaptive Prompting - The Feedback Dance

Eventually, even your best structured prompts will miss the mark. Maybe the AI didn't quite understand your intent, or it misinterpreted a key requirement. Level 3 represents a profound mental shift in how you handle these situations.

Instead of getting frustrated or starting over with a completely new chat, you continue prompting to see each interaction as part of an ongoing conversation. You analyze what went wrong, and you provide feedback to guide the AI toward what you actually want.

Create a 3-day itinerary for Paris.

provides a general itinerary with tourist attractions

Day 1: Visit the Eiffel Tower in the morning, explore the Louvre in the afternoon, and stroll along the Seine in the evening...

This is a good start, but I'd prefer fewer tourist attractions and more focus on food experiences. I really love French pastries and wine.

adjusts based on feedback

Day 1: Begin with a morning pastry tour in Le Marais, visiting notable bakeries like Poilâne and Du Pain et des Idées. For lunch, enjoy a wine pairing at...

Much better! Could you include some specific restaurant names for dinner reservations? And I'll be traveling with a 10-year-old, so we'll need some child-friendly activities too.

further refines based on new information

Day 1: Morning pastry tour in Le Marais... For dinner, consider making reservations at Le Petit Prince, which is known for their child-friendly atmosphere while still offering authentic French cuisine. Before dinner, your 10-year-old might enjoy the interactive exhibits at the Science Museum...

This looks good, but I notice you've scheduled wine tasting for all three afternoons. That's too much wine for a trip with a child. Could you replace two of those with other food experiences like a cheese tasting and a cooking class?

corrects the imbalance in the itinerary

You're absolutely right. Here's the revised itinerary:
Day 1: Morning pastry tour in Le Marais, lunch with wine pairing at La Cave à Vin...
Day 2: Morning visit to the Luxembourg Gardens, followed by a family-friendly cheese tasting at Fromagerie Barthélémy...
Day 3: Morning at Musée d'Orsay, afternoon French cooking class at La Cuisine Paris where they offer special activities for children...

Perfect! One last thing - we'll be relying on public transportation. Could you note which Metro lines to take between locations?

completes the refined itinerary with transportation details

Day 1: Begin with a morning pastry tour in Le Marais (take Metro Line 1 to Saint-Paul station)... To reach Le Petit Prince restaurant, take Metro Line 4 from Cité to Saint-Germain-des-Prés...

This series of prompt -> response -> feedback -> improved response transforms the interaction from a transactional exchange into a collaborative process. Highlighted text shows important feedback mechanisms, saying what is right, and what needs to change. This signals to the AI many more things than you may imagine. It's a signal into dialogue patterns, detail patterns, preferences, and tone that the AI will try to generalize and adapt to.

You start to develop a feel for how to nudge the AI in the right direction when it strays off course, adding new requirements one at a time while building on what works.

Parallel Examples from Different Domains

DomainLevel 3: Adaptive Prompting Parallel
Ping PongYou don't have shot placement down yet, but you have a bunch of tricks up your sleeve, if you can pull them off. During a match, you notice your opponent struggles with your topspin serves but handles your backhand shots easily. You adapt mid-game, emphasizing your serves and avoiding backhand exchanges. If they adjust to your serves, you switch tactics again.
Cognitive DevelopmentA child tries to build a tower with blocks, but it keeps falling. They observe which arrangements are unstable, try putting larger blocks at the bottom, and learn that a wider base creates stability. When one approach fails, they try another based on what they observed. "That didn't work because the blocks were wobbly. Let me try a different way."
CookingWhile making soup, you taste it and realize it needs more flavor. You add salt, taste again, then maybe add herbs, taste again, perhaps a splash of acid. You notice the effects of too much heat, not enough heat. You're not following a recipe rigidly—you're responding to feedback from each taste test.
ProgrammingYou write a function, test it, and discover it doesn't handle a certain edge case. Rather than starting over, you modify your approach. Test again, find another issue, refine further. You debug by observing what specifically is failing and address just those parts. Each test result informs your next code adjustment.

Attention Mechanisms & The Semantic Vector Space at Level 3

At this level, dynamic reconfiguration begins to occur within the AI's attention mechanisms and semantic vector space. Each exchange creates stronger connections between related concepts as you guide the AI toward your desired outcome. Positive reinforcement and corrections alter relationships, confirming patterns and direction, redirecting the relationships.

It is not a deep reconfiguration, semantically it's not altering the way the AI is thinking, but it is guiding the AI towards patterned understanding of tone, intention, level of detail, and hints at POV or perspective. You are not redefining words and semantics themselves, but you are adapting to the AI and the AI is adapting to you.

How the AI is Thinking

Complex Single Prompt: "I need to write a 2-page summary of recent climate change research for my environmental science class. It needs to cover both the scientific evidence and policy implications. Make it engaging for college students but also rigorous enough to satisfy my professor who's quite critical. I'm personally concerned about climate impacts but my university is in a conservative area. Due tomorrow."

AI's Adaptive Thought Process:

This prompt contains multiple dimensions that I need to balance:

  1. Content requirements: Scientific evidence AND policy implications
  2. Audience complexity: Engaging for students BUT rigorous for professor
  3. Tone dilemma: Reflects personal concern YET appropriate for conservative setting
  4. Time constraint: Due tomorrow (implies straightforward, actionable guidance)

Implicit decisions I must make:

  • How much weight to give scientific evidence vs. policy discussion? Scientific evidence should likely come first and form foundation
  • Which scientific findings are most relevant for college students? Need to balance recent headlines with fundamental research
  • How to handle the political sensitivity? Focus on factual reporting with balanced policy coverage
  • What level of scientific detail is appropriate? Likely need citations but avoid excessive technical jargon

Where the AI is Guessing (relying on probabilities):

For this request, the AI must make educated guesses about numerous ambiguities:

  • How politically charged is "conservative area"? Is this politically divided on climate issues, or merely traditional in academic approach?
  • How technical is the professor's "critical" standard? Do they expect peer-reviewed citations, original analysis, or simply logical coherence?
  • What's the student's actual knowledge level? The prompt doesn't indicate their familiarity with climate science terminology or concepts.
  • What does "engaging for college students" mean for this topic? Does this require humor, visuals, contemporary references, or just clear explanations?
  • Which scientific evidence is most important? The prompt doesn't specify which climate aspects (temperature records, sea level rise, extreme weather) matter most.
  • What balance between science and policy is expected? A 50/50 split? More science than policy? Does "2 pages" mean equal coverage?
  • What kind of policy discussion would be appropriate? Purely descriptive of existing policies, or evaluative of their effectiveness?
  • What timeframe constitutes "recent" research? Last 6 months? Last 2 years? Last 5 years?
  • What format is expected? The prompt doesn't specify if this should be an outline, an essay draft, or a bullet-point summary.

The Aha Moment: When you realize you've developed an intuition for guiding the AI through feedback. "I don't need perfect prompts - I need good enough prompts plus effective feedback." You start to see the conversation as a collaborative process rather than a zero-shot (one prompt) request. Instead of expecting the AI to read your mind, you begin to enjoy the process of guiding it toward your desired outcome through iterative refinement. You are starting to see that interactions are shaped by you, and by the feedback you give.

The Bridge to Advanced Levels

As you master adaptive prompting, you'll notice something interesting happening. Your interactions become smoother, more nuanced, and more productive. You develop an intuitive sense of how to guide the AI toward your desired outcomes. You're no longer just using the AI—you're collaborating with it.

This marks the threshold of advanced prompt engineering, where you'll begin to design entire conversations, shape the AI's attention mechanisms, and ultimately transform its cognitive frameworks. These advanced levels—which we'll explore in a future article—represent the frontier of human-AI collaboration.

Practical Tips for Mastering Adaptive Prompting

  • View each response as feedback, not just an output

    • Look for what's good and what needs improvement
    • Use the AI's output as a guide for your next prompt
  • Develop the habit of analyzing why a response missed the mark

    • Did the AI misunderstand a concept?
    • Did it focus on the wrong aspect of your request?
    • Did it make incorrect assumptions about your needs?
  • Use effective feedback phrases

    • "That's close, but I need..."
    • "You're on the right track, but could you focus more on..."
    • "I like the [specific part], could you expand on that while revising [other part]?"
  • Keep track of which refinement patterns work best for specific types of tasks

    • Creative writing might need different feedback than technical documentation
    • Visual descriptions might need different guidance than logical analysis
  • Remember that sometimes starting fresh is more efficient than multiple refinements

    • If you're more than 3-4 iterations in with little progress, consider starting a new conversation with a clearer initial prompt

Happy Prompting!

Series Navigation

Level 1: Basic Prompting

Level 2: Structured Prompting

Level 3: Adaptive Prompting

Level 4: Conversational Prompting

Level 5: Attention Engineering

Coming Soon!
Level 6:
Cognitive Framework Engineering

Tags:

prompt-engineeringcognitive-frameworksai-interactionadaptive-promptingfeedback-loopslearn-prompt-engineeringimprove-prompt-engineeringadvanced-prompt-engineering